Evidence-Based TeleNP

Evidence Supporting Virtual Neuropsychological Evaluation

Peer-reviewed research supports the validity and reliability of teleneuropsychological assessment when clinically appropriate measures, standardized procedures, and qualified clinical judgment are used.

Clinical appropriateness remains central to every evaluation.
Peer-Reviewed Research

Teleneuropsychology: Evidence for Video-Based Assessment

.74
Mean intraclass correlation in a randomized crossover study
202 adults studied
2014 published research
19 Studies included in a systematic review
Selected Measures strong validity support
Research-informed
Peer-reviewed evidence
Standardized procedures
Qualified clinical judgment
Patient-centered access
What Does the Research Say?

Virtual assessment can be rigorous, reliable, and clinically appropriate.

Teleneuropsychology allows neuropsychological assessment to be conducted through secure videoconferencing, expanding access to specialized evaluation for patients who may otherwise face geographic, mobility, or scheduling barriers.

Peer-reviewed research supports the use of video-based neuropsychological assessment for selected measures and appropriately selected patients when standardized procedures and clinical judgment are maintained.

The Evidence

What the research tells us

Multiple lines of peer-reviewed research have examined the validity, reliability, and practical considerations of teleneuropsychological assessment.

Strong Agreement With In-Person Testing

A randomized crossover study comparing videoconference and face-to-face neuropsychological testing found highly similar results across administration methods for commonly used neuropsychological measures.

The study included 202 adults, including people with and without cognitive impairment, and found significant intraclass correlations between video-conference and in-person scores.

Cullum et al., Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2014
19

Systematic Review Supports TeleNP Validity

A systematic review incorporating 19 studies across multiple countries and diverse diagnostic populations found good overall support for teleneuropsychological assessment in older adults.

  • Cognitive screening
  • Language
  • Attention and working memory
  • Verbal memory
Marra et al., The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2020

Supported by Major Neuropsychology Organizations

Inter Organizational Practice Committee guidance concluded that the literature indicates TeleNP may provide reliable and valid assessments when appropriate clinical procedures are followed.

Guidance emphasizes appropriate test selection, informed consent, documentation of modified procedures, consideration of limitations, and clinical judgment.

Bilder et al., Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology / The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2020
202 adults in a randomized crossover study
19 studies in a systematic review
44+ states served by Minder
1–2 weeks typical appointment window
Workers' Compensation

Expanding access to specialized evaluation.

Virtual neuropsychological evaluation can provide access to specialized clinical expertise without requiring the injured worker to travel significant distances or wait months for a local appointment.

When clinically appropriate, TeleNP can support evaluation of cognitive and psychological concerns associated with injury, neurological conditions, trauma, and functional questions.

Discuss a Referral →

Areas commonly evaluated

TBI & Concussion Cognitive Impairment Memory Concerns Neurological Injury PTSD & Trauma Psychological Conditions Functional Questions Return-to-Work Questions
Clinical Appropriateness Matters

TeleNP is more than moving a test onto a screen.

Clinical rigor depends on thoughtful patient selection, appropriate measures, standardized procedures, and professional judgment.

Virtual assessment is not simply an in-person battery moved onto a computer. The evaluating psychologist must determine whether telehealth is appropriate for the individual patient and referral question.

Patient selection Determine whether virtual assessment is appropriate for the individual.
Appropriate test selection Select measures suitable for remote administration.
Standardized procedures Follow established administration and testing procedures.
Environmental & technology factors Consider setting, technology, privacy, and other relevant factors.
Documentation & clinical judgment Document relevant limitations and integrate professional judgment.
Clinical judgment remains central to the evaluation regardless of whether it is conducted virtually or in person.
A Clinical Process

Access without sacrificing rigor

A virtual evaluation should be designed around the patient, referral question, and clinical requirements.

01

Determine Appropriateness

The clinical team considers the referral question, patient characteristics, testing needs, and whether a virtual format is appropriate.

02

Conduct the Evaluation

Appropriate measures are administered through secure videoconferencing using standardized procedures.

03

Deliver Clinical Insight

Findings are interpreted in context and translated into clinically meaningful recommendations.

The Minder Difference

Specialized care, without unnecessary barriers.

Minder Memory provides comprehensive virtual neuropsychological and psychological evaluations for children and adults across the United States.

01

Speed & Accessibility

Access specialized clinical expertise without unnecessary geographic or scheduling barriers.

02

Virtual Convenience

Evaluations can be completed remotely when clinically appropriate.

03

Specialized Expertise

Connect patients with clinicians who specialize in neuropsychological and psychological evaluation.

Selected References

Research behind the discussion

Selected peer-reviewed sources supporting the use and ongoing evaluation of teleneuropsychology.

01

Cullum CM, Hynan LS, Grosch M, Parikh M, Weiner MF. Teleneuropsychology: Evidence for Video Teleconference-Based Neuropsychological Assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2014;20(10):1028–1033.


View publication →
02

Marra DE, Hamlet KM, Bauer RM, Bowers D. Validity of Teleneuropsychology for Older Adults in Response to COVID-19: A Systematic and Critical Review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2020;34(7–8):1411–1452.


View publication →
03

Bilder RM, Postal KS, Barisa M, et al. Inter Organizational Practice Committee Recommendations/Guidance for Teleneuropsychology in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2020.

04

Remote Neuropsychological Assessment: Teleneuropsychology. 2024.

Minder Memory Center
Virtual Neuropsychological + Psychological Evaluations

Expanding access without sacrificing clinical rigor.

Virtual evaluation can help connect injured workers and other patients with specialized clinical expertise while reducing unnecessary travel and scheduling barriers.

Learn More
Virtual Evaluations 44+ States Appointments Typically Within 1–2 Weeks
Scan to learn more Learn More / Refer a Case Scan to visit Minder Memory